A critical look at the notion 'pro-form'. Evidence from indexical markers, spoken discourse and (French) child language
Résumé
The notion and term 'pro-form' are widely used in current Linguistics, in particular in studies of anaphora. They represent a generalisation based on the etymology of the term 'pronoun', extended thereby to 'pro-verbs', 'pro-VPs', 'pro-NPs', 'pro-APs' and 'pro-sentences'. The conception underlying such a usage is evidently that of the substitution of some already-mentioned textual expression by an attenuated expression (the 'pro-form'), thereby avoiding a redundant repetition of the antecedent expression at that point in the evolving co-text. The present article's goal is to show that this account is inaccurate as well as misleading as a representation of what actually goes on in extended texts, by focusing on three areas of investigation: first, a characterisation of the range of indexicals purportedly operating as 'pro-forms', together with the three major types of indexical referring procedure which they help to realise (anaphora, deixis and 'anadeixis'); next, a study of their functioning in adult unplanned interactive spoken discourse; and finally, a brief survey of the acquisition of certain French indexicals by very young children. The article proposes an alternative conception of indexical reference in discourse.
Domaines
Sciences de l'Homme et Société
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)